By Prosper Mene
The Federal High Court in Abuja has postponed the trial of suspended Kogi Central Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan on cybercrime charges until October 20, after a preliminary objection from her defense team questioning the court’s jurisdiction over the case.
The adjournment came during a scheduled hearing on Monday, where the prosecution, led by Federal Government lawyer David Kaswe, was prepared to call its first witness and kick off proceedings on the six-count indictment.
However, defense counsel Ehiogie West-Idahosa, SAN, raised the jurisdictional challenge, arguing that the court lacks the authority to entertain the charges.
Justice Mohammed Umar agreed that the objection must be resolved first, halting the trial and setting the new date for both the hearing on the motion and potential commencement of evidence.
Akpoti-Uduaghan, known for her outspoken advocacy, was arraigned on June 30, 2025, before Justice Umar. She was granted bail on self-recognition shortly after. The charges, filed under suit number FHC/ABJ/CR/195/2025 by the Director of Public Prosecutions, Mohammed Abubakar, invoke the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) (Amendment) Act, 2024.
Prosecutors allege that between April and May 2025, the senator intentionally transmitted false and defamatory statements via electronic means, specifically during public addresses in Ihima Community, Kogi State, aimed at maligning high-profile politicians and inciting public disorder.
Key allegations include claims that Akpoti-Uduaghan accused Senate President Godswill Akpabio of plotting her assassination in collusion with former Kogi Governor Yahaya Bello. One count reads: “Akpabio told Yahaya Bello ‘He told him that he should make sure that killing me does not happen in Abuja, it should be done here, so it will seem as if it is the people that killed me here…’ And you, Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, knew this contained a threat that could harm the reputation of Senator Godswill Obot Akpabio, GCON.” Similar accusations target Bello, with the statements purportedly damaging their reputations and breaching public order, punishable under Section 24(2)(c) of the Act.
Kaswe pushed back against the delay, insisting the objection was baseless and that the court has clear jurisdiction over federal cybercrime matters. “The prosecution is ready to prove its case,” he told the court, urging an immediate start to the trial.
Critics view the charges as politically motivated retaliation for her vocal criticisms of Senate leadership, while supporters of the prosecution frame it as a necessary enforcement of laws against online defamation and threats. Akpoti-Uduaghan has denied the allegations, maintaining that her statements were protected political speech.















